A Revista Cadernos de Cultura e Ciência é de caráter nacional e multidisciplinar, cadastrada com o ISSN 1980-5861.

Comentários do leitor

The Pain of Sbobet

por Stan Heinig (2019-08-05)

I simply finished watching the popular Disney movie, "Frozen", for the other time. The hype bordering the movie was obnoxious and everyone was saying that, "'Frozen' is one of the best movies of all time. " Watching it my new around, it wasn't great; the bar was set quite high and my anticipations didn't meet up to the actuality of the movie. But after my second time observing it, it has solidified inside my brain that this movie is among the worst Disney has ever produced.

There's actually a funny history surrounding this film. Walt Disney wanted to get this to movie all the way back in 1943. "Frozen" was supposed to be Disney's adaptation of the popular apologue, "The Snow Queen", written by Hans Christian Anderson (Get it? Hans, Kristoff, Ould -, Sven. Good job, Disney). "The Snow Queen" actually features, what would be Elsa, seeing that the villain. They made the decision they couldn't create film production company in the 40s because that they couldn't find a way to adjust it to a modern target audience. They tried again back in the 1990s, but the project was scrapped when one of the head animators on the project, Glen Keane, quit. In 2010, they scrapped it again mainly because they still couldn't discover a way to make the story work. After that, in 2011, they finally deciding on making Anna the younger sibling of the Snow Queen, which was enough for them to create "Frozen".

"Frozen" was directed by simply Chris Buck (known pertaining to "Tarzan") and Jennifer Shelter (known for "Wreck-it-Ralph"). The line was set pretty large for me seeing as both these movies were well above the standards of a "kid's movie". The story was going to be just like the fairy tale, but then, Christophe Beck composed the hit song, "Let it Go". The availability team went crazy; instead of trying to fit the tune into the movie, they rewrote the entire plot and Elsa's entire character to fit the song. I have never discovered an entire movie being changed to fit one song. For that reason, it's blatantly obvious that no one could decide on anything in this movie. Since Elsa isn't the antagonist, right now there really was no real bad force. The Duke of Weaselton is brought up as the villain in the beginning when he states, "Open those gates so I may unlock your secrets and exploit your riches. Did I say that out loud? " Why do you want to unlock the secrets and exploit their riches?

The Fight it out has absolutely no development to the point where he doesn't even have a name. He barely even gets screen time. Consequently if he isn't the villain, who is? Well, within the last 15 minutes of the movie, Anna's fiance, Prince Hans, can be brought up to be the villain, stating he wants to rule a kingdom and he aren't because of his 12 other brothers. This comes out of absolutely nowhere. There have been no hints, no nasty glances, mysbobet no sidebars or monologues, nothing. He also gives out blankets and sizzling soup to every person inside the kingdom of Airendale. Dictator Hans even says, he may protect Airendale because Anna left him in charge and "will not hesitate to defend Airendale from treason" when the Duke states he would like to take over. I can't stand it when they get so sluggish as to just throw in a villain at the last few minutes because they couldn't in fact bring up a real villain. Emporer Hans states that he wanted to take over and having been going to kill Elsa and all this other crap, yet Elsa was just about being killed and he kept her life. Why would probably he save her life if he wanted her dead? None of it produced sense and it irked me the entire movie.

Frosty recycles animation and figure models from their previous hit, "Tangled". The main characters, Elsa and Anna, use the same exact model as Rapunzel from "Tangled". This equipment has been huge around the internet, calling Disney "lazy" as well as the such. Personally, I was okay with this. Disney is well know for recycling animations (which can be seen here). Even though it really was strange that Elsa and Anna had the same actual face and body structure and the only difference between them had been the freckles and their frizzy hair, it didn't bother me personally too much. But , during the coronation scene, Elsa says to Anna, "You look gorgeous. " Pretty ironic if you ask me.

The movie starts off with Elsa and Ould - playing together with Elsa's ice magic. It's cute initially, but then Elsa strikes Ould - in her head plus they have to "thaw out the ice" or something along those lines. Thus they ask the trolls to heal her and in addition they wipe Anna's memories of Elsa having magic. Then, they lock the adventure doors so no one can watch Elsa and lock Elsa away in her space to never speak to her sibling again. This is where it all begins to go downhill. None of the usb ports made sense. Why might you wipe Anna's memories of Elsa having magic? If it was easily fixed, perhaps you should just explain to her that they can can't play with Elsa's magic anymore because it's out of hand? She would've known the effects afterwards. It's like if you touch a hot stove; you're curious, you contact it, you burn your self, you never touch it again. The fear solidifies subconsciously. Even if you could explain how come she needed her memories erased, why was Anna locked inside the castle entry doors too? Anna had simply no recollection of the events, possibly at the end of the movie, so why was Anna being punished for something Elsa performed? They could have easily allowed her to talk to the townsfolk and have a good time outside the adventure while Elsa was locked away.

There's this design throughout the movie about locked doors; they lock the castle doors, Anna knocks on Elsa's door and she never answers, Anna and Prince Hans sing out the song, "Love can be an Open Door", Anna says to Elsa, "All you know is how to shut people out. " I found the motif pretty clever right up until they forced it straight down my throat. When Ould - reaches the ice castle, the girl knocks on the door. When the door opens, she says, "Well that's a first. " It's a giant punch in the torso when you think you've assessed a motif and you can go on and on about how amazing the directors were for putting it in there, but then the directors hold your hand and forcefully say, "Hey! This kind of a motif! You should absolutely love us for this! inch I would've been alright with it too in the event they just didn't place that one line in the movie. When you read a book and you analyze it, the author is attempting to let you come to the final result yourself and let you talk about it. It's the same with movies. There was no need to forcefully show that this was a motif. Accomplishing this was actually counterproductive. It jumped my bubble.

This lead me to the question, "Why was Anna the main character? " Here's a checklist of each plot-moving event in the motion picture:

Elsa strikes Anna consequently they have to lock the adventure gates and Elsa cannot talk to anyone ever again
Elsa is becoming queen
The entire empire gets frozen over due to Elsa
Elsa arguably gets the best song in the complete movie
Anna has to get Elsa so that Elsa can help you the entire kingdom
Hans has to kill Elsa to become full

Everything centers around Elsa. So why have Anna be the main character? Anna failed to have any real character development in the movie when Elsa was completely fleshed out in every scene that she's in. Just view the scene from her song, "Let It Go"The entire song is about her "letting go" of her fear and coming to conditions with her powers and being herself. This would've made a for a better plot; a woman finally coming to terms with herself, world trying to shut her straight down, and her fight to be accepted as who the girl with. Instead, it's about Anna trying to find her sister consequently her sister can save the dominion. It's like Phil becoming the main character of Hercules or Mushu being the key character for Mulan. It doesn't make any sense. Anna isn't as interesting seeing that Elsa. Sure, she's funny and relate-able, but that can easily have been Elsa. Everyone is able to relate to not fitting in to the social norms. So I reiterate, why have Anna get the main character?

Speaking of Anna, they said the only way to save her was "one true take action of love". There were various "true acts of love. inches Kristoff bringing her to the trolls, Olaf giving her that pep talk, Kristoff bringing her to Hans to save her. All of these were "true acts of love", but non-e of them counted because it didn't "fit the dynamic of sisterhood. inch The whole dynamic between Elsa and Anna felt therefore forced to the point where I quit caring halfway through the movie. Mostly because Anna does not actually evolve as a persona until the very end of the movie. Even then, the development isn't that major. Olaf is another thing that felt so force-fed. It was cute the snowman Elsa and Anna created when they were young became a real living being and helped Anna out on her quest, but he did not do much. At all. He sings a song about the summer, makes a ton of jokes, gives Anna a pep talk at the end with the movie, more jokes, in that case that's it. He isn't going to really face much adversity, making him extremely you dimensional. It's obvious installed him in there just to become cute and to target a wider audience. There's a evaluation that I use to explain you dimensional characters; if you can exchange the character with a lamp, and the plot could still move forward, then the character didn't ought to be there. I promise you, if you watch the movie again and follow that test, you'll understand exactly what My spouse and i saying. What's worse is the fact he could've actually recently been a catalyst to Anna regaining her memories of her sister and finally knowing why she feels the way the lady does. But instead, your dog is nothing but a comedic comfort that has no part in the plot whatsoever.

The whole video and plot felt consequently rushed and like no-one could agree on anything. In the villains to the plot towards the characters; it's all hurried. It felt like they said, "Hey, "Tangled" was great! Why don't we just take the stuff we used from "Tangled" and get this movie off our checklist after 70 years. " But , there is the one thing that did surprise myself; the soundtrack. The music was phenomenal. Every song experienced very broadway-esque and suit the scenes perfectly. "Let It Go", "Love is certainly an Open Door", and all other songs made my center soar and gave me optimism the next Disney titles to obtain music on par while using classics like "Mulan" or "The Lion King".

And that is my opinion on Disney's "Frozen". Honestly, this movie was just plain bad. I say, await it to go on Broadway and discover it there. I tightly believe that the Broadway musical technology will be light-years better than this atrocity. They'll have more coming back production, more time to explain and develop their characters and plots, and the effects will be really sick. I cannot wait to see how they talk about Elsa's Ice Castle! Understand what agree with any of my items, do feel free to leave a comment with your opinion! Unless of course you're gonna argue that this movie wasn't targeted to my own demographic and that it was "made for kids". I will after that point you in the guidelines of the masterpieces known as "Tangled", "The Lion King", "Mulan", "Brave", and almost every other Disney movie before this. We would love to see what all others thought of the movie!

ISSN: 1980-5861